Diaper Fetish: Ripped Right From the CIA Manual

When I was a newcomer to the diaper scene I happened across an older, daddy-type on that day's diaper 'community', DPF.com. He was from another part of New York state and, since there weren't very many of us back then, he found me - a collegebaby at the time - and immediately set his sights on me. He wanted to meet - something I wasn't entirely comfortable with at the time - and, what's more, he wanted me to drive the four hours to visit him. I was less-than-enthusiastic, being young, busy with college, and not interested in guys in their 40s, so I made excuses - I've always tried to be nice, it seems - and put off the inevitable just say no.

At some point the guy got the impression that I was afraid to meet anyone and began to attempt to assuage my fears, offering several important facts to relax:

• he wouldn't take pictures without my permission - lol.
• he would stop if I asked him to stop... uh, ok.
• diapers are not illegal.

I appreciated the first two points, as much as they probably creeped me out at the time. The third made me laugh. I was quite aware that there was no criminal statute against putting on Depends - even for our purposes. His telling me this was not going to make me jump in the car and head on down the highway.

Still, in the years that have passed it's amazing how many times I've had people bring up diapers and the law.

When I departed from New York for the south in 2006 more than one abdl told me they'd been secretly warned - diaper daddy drama, lol - that they should "be careful" because that "Abysitter dude is a cop."

(Me: "There is no law that says you can't wear a diaper, son... wtf.")

And I've had people meeting up with me ask me point-blank: "Are you a police officer?"

The irony that I have paid straight, non-ABDL dudes to wear diapers many, many times isn't lost on me. That is, in fact, a form of p-r-o-s-t-i-t-u-t-i-o-n; doing the diapers-for-dough thing requires a dozen different safeguards, since the actual P-word doesn't take effect until there's some sort of sexual contact or act; even then, paying someone to wear a diaper doesn't actually break any laws. 

Still, with the number of people in our fetish masquerading as "daddies" so they can seek out and have sex with young people... coupled with the few amongst us who enjoy child pornography instead of the adult version... I guess it's no wonder the topic of diapers and the law comes up occasionally.

Today the government admitted that diapering people is no big deal.

My 40-yo Daddy Friend was a prison guard and, for a time, he specialized in transporting prison inmates through New York state. To help illustrate his point that diapers aren't a crime, he told me about how they're used in the prison system: during transports inmates are either required, or allowed, to wear adult undergarments. They're sometimes called Dignity Pants, and inmates are allowed to put them on to make the transport more - well, dignified.

Inmates who are high behavioral risks are sometimes outfitted with shock devices which allow correctional officers to zap them with high-voltage shocks if they get out of hand. Such a shock causes an inmate to involuntarily lose control of his bladder and, sometimes, bowels. Allowing the inmate to wear a diaper is supposed to lessen the humiliation of such a shock. (Considering the fact that one guard sometimes carries the trigger for shock devices for up to half a dozen inmates, and mistakes have been known to happen - including a courtroom brawl in which four inmates were shocked before the frazzled guard got the shock collar for the right one - a surprise wetting/pooping isn't entirely uncommon). 

The buses used for transports are sometimes outfitted with cages and, for longer transports, inmates are often advised they won't have the option to use the lavatory mid-trip; these inmates will sometimes opt to put on adult diapers for the same reason. 

My friend figured that I'd say Well, FUCK it... if they're good enough for rapists and killers they're good enough for me!

But, not quite.

Today, though, the Obama administration released documents which detail what most of us in the community have known for quite some time: diapers are being used by the CIA as part of their interrogation techniques.

(Put a diaper on a terror suspect and they'll tell anything! HUH?!?!) 

Now, I know what some of you are thinking: America doesn't torture... diapering interrogation suspects, that's sheer bliss!

If you're not a diaper fetishist, however, being diapered as part of an interrogation isn't pleasurable at all.

It's hard to believe America does it. But we do it every day.

According to a report in 2007 from the International Committee of the Red Cross, renditions - operations in which we kidnapped terror suspects from the streets of their home countries and transported them to foreign countries for torture - including diapering:

Conditions of Transfer - According to a 2007 report by the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC—see March 15, 2009), detainees flown on CIA rendition flights would be: 
 Photographed both clothed and naked; 
 Subjected to body cavity (rectal) searches, with some detainees later alleging that they were administered suppositories of some sort; 
 Dressed in a diaper and a tracksuit, with earphones placed over the ears (through which shatteringly loud music would sometimes be played), a blindfold, black goggles, and sometimes cotton wool placed over the eyes; 
 Shackled by hands and feet, and thus carried onto an airplane, where they would remain, without toilet privileges, from one to 30 hours. 
The prisoners would usually be allowed to sit upright, but the ICRC will later find that on “some occasions detainees were transported lying flat on the floor of the plane… with their hands cuffed behind their backs,” causing them “severe pain and discomfort,” as they were moved from one location to another. [NEW YORK REVIEW OF BOOKS, 3/15/2009]

Detainees referred to in the above report claimed that they were given suppositories and one, in fact, is suing, alleging that he was given an enema and then diapered. (The suit doesn't state whether he was diapered immediately following being given the enema). Soldiers responsible for transporting large groups of terror suspects have described conditions in which as many as fifty diapered detainees were held in the belly of cargo planes for over twelve hours, with diapers quickly becoming stinky and the stench becoming atrocious.

Today's CIA memos released by the Obama administration include a document authored by legal counsel under the Bush administration. He lays out a lot of techniques considered torture under the Geneva Conventions - and anyone with an ounce of common sense. Waterboarding? OK. Slapping inmates? OK. Diapering inmates? Go for it!

http://www.aclu.org/safefree/general/olc_memos.html 

Check out the link above.

From CNN.com:

"Another memo to Rizzo, from Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Steven G. Bradbury on May 10, 2005, noted that nudity could be used as an interrogation technique.

"Detainees subject to sleep deprivation who are also subject to nudity as a separate interrogation technique will at times be nude and wearing a diaper," it said, noting that the diaper is "for sanitary and health purposes of the detainee; it is not used for the purpose of humiliating the detainee and it is not considered to be an interrogation technique."

"The detainee's skin condition is monitored, and diapers are changed as needed so that the detainee does not remain in a soiled diaper," the memo said."

I know about one hundred ABDL people - myself included - who would find the idea of being diapered, and having our diapers changed, by soldiers to be something of a fantasy.

For others, however, it's tantamount to torture.

Go figure.

I figured I'd take a moment from my usual blogging to share a little bit of current events with everyone. And what's more eventful than the U.S. CIA admitting it likes to put a diaper on a guy from time to time? Nothing wrong with that...

You go, CIA! 

But as for the rest of that torture stuff you do... go fuck yourself.